Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Innovation Patents
  • The Australian experience
2
What are they?
  • Introduced in 2001
  • Replaced old “petty patent”
  • Fast & cheap to obtain – apply online!
  • Lower standard of “innovative step”
  • Granted on formalities check
  • No pre-grant opposition
  • Examination only on request
3
What are they for?
  • Protection for “lower-level” inventions
  • Not greatly different from existing technology – but having commercial value
  • Typically suited to individuals or SMEs
  • Short product cycle
  • Works in tandem with standard patents
4
What are the limitations?
  • Shorter protection period – 8 years
  • No checks carried out before issue
  • Maximum 5 claims
  • Cannot be enforced until examined and certified
5
Did inventors take them up?
  • Standard patent applications:
  • in 2001 = 22742
  • in 2003 = 21623
  • Approx 88% companies, 12% individuals
  • Innovation patents since 2001:
  • 3228 (double petty patent rate) - BUT
  • Only 374 certified (December 2003)
  • Approx 31% companies, 69% individuals
6
Industries
7
Paths to investment
  • Investment for R & D
  • Equity partners
  • Easier to test potential protection for the technology
8
Unintended consequences?
  • Infringement pending standard patent
  •  - Wait until granted?
  •  - Warn infringer of application? (letter of demand)
  • Innovation patent & certification
  •  - Grant within weeks
  •  - Structure claims to meet infringement
9
Paths to settlement
  • Litigation on innovation patent
  • Basis for interlocutory relief
  • Validity issues raised in Court can be addressed in standard application (modified claims)
10
Could it work here?
  • Two-tier system put forward as opposition amendment to Patents Bill
  • Preliminary search before grant
  • PO to issue “preliminary patent” with option of “substantive examination” within 3 years
  • Defeated in committee