|
1
|
- The Australian experience
|
|
2
|
- Introduced in 2001
- Replaced old “petty patent”
- Fast & cheap to obtain – apply online!
- Lower standard of “innovative step”
- Granted on formalities check
- No pre-grant opposition
- Examination only on request
|
|
3
|
- Protection for “lower-level” inventions
- Not greatly different from existing technology – but having commercial
value
- Typically suited to individuals or SMEs
- Short product cycle
- Works in tandem with standard patents
|
|
4
|
- Shorter protection period – 8 years
- No checks carried out before issue
- Maximum 5 claims
- Cannot be enforced until examined and certified
|
|
5
|
- Standard patent applications:
- in 2001 = 22742
- in 2003 = 21623
- Approx 88% companies, 12% individuals
- Innovation patents since 2001:
- 3228 (double petty patent rate) - BUT
- Only 374 certified (December 2003)
- Approx 31% companies, 69% individuals
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- Investment for R & D
- Equity partners
- Easier to test potential protection for the technology
|
|
8
|
- Infringement pending standard patent
- - Wait until granted?
- - Warn infringer of application?
(letter of demand)
- Innovation patent & certification
- - Grant within weeks
- - Structure claims to meet
infringement
|
|
9
|
- Litigation on innovation patent
- Basis for interlocutory relief
- Validity issues raised in Court can be addressed in standard application
(modified claims)
|
|
10
|
- Two-tier system put forward as opposition amendment to Patents Bill
- Preliminary search before grant
- PO to issue “preliminary patent” with option of “substantive
examination” within 3 years
- Defeated in committee
|