International Agreements
TRIPS
Patent Co-operation Treaty
European Patent Convention
Consolidated amendments
UK Legislation
Patents Act 1977 (Unofficial
consolidation)
Patents Act 2004
Patent Office
Manual of Patent Practice (Part 1
Patentability)
Cases
Re CHPH's Applications
[2005] EWHC 1589 (Patents Court Peter Prescott QC 21 July 2005)
Last updated 29 Feb 2004
Art 52 (1) EPC provides that European patents shall be granted for any inventions which are susceptible of industrial application, new and involve an inventive step. The following are excluded by paragraph (2) of that article from the definition of inventions within the meaning of paragraph (1):
|
|
discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical methods |
|
|
aesthetic creations |
|
|
schemes, rules and methods for performing mental acts, playing games or doing business, and programs for computers and |
|
|
presentations of information. |
However, paragraph (3)
qualifies paragraph (2) by limiting the exclusion of patentability only to
the extent to which a European patent or European patent application relates
to such subject matter or such activities as such. Also excluded are
inventions the publication or exploitation of which would be contrary to
ordre public or morality and plant or animal varieties or essentially
biological processes for the production of plants or animals but not
microbiological processes. S. 1 of the
Patents Act 1977.
American and Japanese Requirements
It is interesting to compare art 52 (1) EPC with the corresponding
provisions of the US and Japanese patent statutes.
§ 101 of the US Patents Act
which provides:
"Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title"
In contrast to the European definition, the US definition of an invention in § 100 (a) specifically includes "discovery". S. 29 (1) of the Japanese Patents Law (Law No. 121 of April 13, 1959 as amended by Law No. 220 of December 22, 1999) provides:
"Any person who has made an invention which is industrially applicable may obtain a patent therefor, except in the case of the following inventions.",
The exceptions relate to
novelty, obviousness and inventions which may not be patented for reasons of
public policy. An invention is defined by section 2 (1) as "the highly
advanced creation of technical ideas by which a law of nature is utilized."
The absence of anything corresponding to article 52 (2) of the EPC in the
American and Japanese patents legislation has no doubt facilitated the
patenting of computer software and business method related inventions in
those countries.
Amendments to Art. 52 (1)
The Act revising the EPC concluded at the diplomatic conference at Munich on 29 November 2000 provides that article 52 (1) should read as follows:
European patents shall be granted for all inventions, in all fields of technology, provided that they are new, involve an inventive step and are susceptible of industrial application."
The express reference to all "fields of technology" should encourage applications for computer, business method and biotechnology inventions in Europe.
Articles
|
John Lambert Software Patents Overview |
Case Notes
Infringement
John Lambert American Home Products Corporation v Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd.
John Lambert Amersham Pharmacia V Amivcon
Insufficiency
John Lambert Playhut Inc. v Spring Form Inc. and others
John Lambert American Home Products Corporation v Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd.
Presentations

Important