Patent Links
Articles
Applying for a Patent
Should you apply for a Patent
fro your Invention?
Australia
Jon Miles Innovation Patents
Patent Reform Group
Community Patents
Community
Patent Overview
Compulsory Licensing
The
Patents and Trade Marks (World Trade Organisation) Regulations 1999
Conventions
Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property
European Patents
Insufficiency
John Lambert Playhut Inc. v Spring Form Inc. and others
Euro-Defences
John Lambert
Intel Corporation v Via Technologies Inc. and others
Legislation
Patents Acts
1977 - 2004
Priority
John Lambert
President's
Application of 29 July 2005
Who is the Inventor
Case Note
Re Cinpress Ltd. and Tamworth
Mouldings Ltd.
Presentation
New
Patent Issues
"All you are ever likely to need to know about patents so long as
you stay in Manchester"
Manchester Law Society 15 Feb 2006
New Patent Office Advisory Opinions
Peter Hayward's Presentation and Handout.
IP Centre of Excellence for the North
24 Nov 2006
Relevant Links
Intellectual Property
>What is a Patent
>Patent FAQs
>Patent Resources
European Patent Office
>Tool Box
>European Patent Convention
UK Patent Office
>Patents Index
>What is a Patent
>Patents in Detail
>Downloadable Information
>Glossary
WIPO (World Intellectual Property
Organization)
>Inventions (Patents)
>Paris Convention for the Protection of
Industrial Property
WTO (World Trade Organization)
>Intellectual Property Gateway
>TRIPs (Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects
of Intellectual Property Rights)
A patent is a 20-year monopoly of a new invention. The monopoly is granted by the state in exchange for disclosing the invention to the public. If the invention is a product, the monopoly is infringed by making, disposing of, using, importing or keeping the product without the consent of the proprietor ("the patentee"). If the invention offering it for use in the UK with the knowledge or in circumstances where it should be obvious that such use without the patentee's consent would infringe the patent) or by disposing of, offer to dispose of, use, importing or keeping any product obtained directly by means of that process.
European Patent
Convention
HM government is party to the
European Patent Convention ("EPC").
This Convention establishes a
European Patent Office ("EPO")
as part of a European Patent Organization with the task of granting European
patents. A European patent may be granted for any one or more of the
contracting states. The European Patent Organization is not an EC
institution and the EPC is not Community law though all EC member states are
party to the Convention. The Commission has
proposed a Community patent
which will subsist within the EPC framework.
National Patents
The EPC did not abolish or supersede national patents. There continue to
exist national patent offices in each of the contracting states which
continue to grant patents (known as "national patents") for their respective
territories. National patent law does not conflict with the EPC but
complements it. For instance, art. 64 (1) EPC provides that in each
contracting state a European patent confers on the patentee the same rights
as would be conferred by a national patent in that state.
Applying for a Patent
An inventor (or someone who derives the right to apply for a patent
inventions through employing or some other arrangement with the inventor)
who desires patent protection in the UK for his or her invention may apply
to
UK Patent Office for a UK
patent or to the EPO for a European patent designating the UK as one of the
countries for the grant ("European patent (UK)"). A considerable
volume of practical information about to apply for a UK patent is available
on the
"How to apply for a patent" page
of the Patent Office website. The EPO website has similar information which
may be accessed from
"Tool Box for Applicants" page. It is stressed that an
application for a patent is not an easy matter and that a lot can go wrong
at various stages. It is prudent to consult a chartered patent agent whose
professional body, the
Chartered Institute of Patent Agents ("CIPA"),
has an online searchable database of members on its website.
International
Conventions
In addition to the EPC, HMG is party to the
Paris Convention for the Protection of
Industrial Property ("Paris Convention"), which provides
for protection on a reciprocal basis of the inventions, trade marks,
industrial designs and other intellectual property of the nationals of
contracting countries, and the
Patent Co-operation Treaty ("PCT"),
which facilitates simultaneous patent applications to more than one patent
office ("international applications"). HMG is also party to the
Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights ("TRIPs"),
which requires among other things members of the
World Trade Organization to
harmonize their national patent laws.
Enforcement
The monopolies granted by European as well as national patents are enforced
by civil proceedings before national courts and tribunals. In England and
Wales there is a special court for patents and registered designs disputes
within the Chancery Division with specialist judges and practices known as
the Patents Court. S. 287 of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988
enables the Lord Chancellor to confer special patents and designs
jurisdiction on any county court thereby designating it as "patents county
court". So far, he has conferred that jurisdiction on the Central London
County Court which is known as the "Patents County Court". The Patents Court
and Patents County Court are the only courts in England and Wales in which
patent proceedings may be brought. Certain proceedings (including
infringement claims with the parties' consent provided no injunction is
sought) may also be brought in the Patent Office.
Risk Factors
It is not always easy to obtain a patent. An application is subject to
examination by the European or UK Patent Office which may uncover a prior
invention or other indication that the invention is not new, that it is
obvious or otherwise not patentable. If the application survives
examination, it is published which gives everybody in the world an
opportunity to show why a patent should not be granted. Even if a patent is
granted it may be subject to revocation. The monopoly granted by the patent
is subject to national and EC competition law. Compulsory licences may be
granted in some circumstances. A patent monopoly is defined by what are
known as "the claims" which are not always easy to draft. If drawn too wide
they may be invalid. If too narrow, they fail to protect the invention. A
patent may be infringed even in the absence of any intention to do so or
even knowledge of the patent's existence. A patentee on the other hand has
to be careful how he alerts infringers or the public to his rights to avoid
liability for groundless threats. If he brings proceedings for infringement
he almost invariable provokes a counterclaim for revocation. Patent
proceedings are expensive and in the EPO they can take a long time to
resolve.
Important